Why present threads we underprivileged can't read?!

Rhett_Bassard

For example: "Recover the Readers level".

1. It wastes front-facing site real estate ('Latest threads') where we could find an eBook rather than discrimination.
2. It negates a learning opportunity for others facing same issue.
3. It 'unrewards' those who read and follow CM rules when they can't read about the slackers who don't bother to follow community standards. The lack of transparancy flies in the face of conventional wisdom, i.e. "Know your friends, but know the enemy better."

/end rant



@nishant (Admin)

Pedro_P

Hi Rhett...
The thread that you have indicated is a thread generated by users who, due to their lack or very little activity, have lost their user level Readers... In this regard, and following the provisions of this thread: «Lost your user level Readers? Please, take a look here», users can recover the Readers user level, fulfilling certain conditions that are established according to each case, and following discretionary criteria.
The new conditions are established only for the requesting user and are not debatable or known to third parties other than the applicants themselves... In that sense, they are reserved.
The reason for this policy is not to generate unnecessary questions or complaints regarding the new conditions that have been established for each requesting user.
There are also threads that are exclusively for CraxMe Team and are also reserved.
It should be noted that, it is not the intention of CraxMe or its Team, to submit to scrutiny, questions or public derision to users who for «X» reasons have not been able to meet the initial conditions to access or keep the Readers level, rather, it is CraxMe's wish, that users who are in this situation, have a second chance to participate and contribute.
There is not much mystery behind these reserved request threads, since they follow the guidelines outlined in the above-mentioned thread.