cynic 9-5-2018 09:44 PM
This is indeed rare. Authors these days just work on churning out books is quick succession, quali ...
Yes, I read Ravi Subramaniam's book. Found a couple of them interesting but when I picked up his third book, it seemed he was simply carrying on with very similar plots and was kind of repetitive. So he is off my list. Last week I tried him once again with his "Murder She Wrote" but it didn't hold my attention even after 40 pages so I gave up.
jhsurti 10-5-2018 05:51 PM
Yes, I read Ravi Subramaniam's book. Found a couple of them interesting but when I picked up his t ...
This is an issue with not just books, in other creative fields as well. Once the authors achieve success with a certain concept, everything that follows is cookie cutter. Very few of them move out of tried and tested formula.
Nothing wrong with ghost writing. There are some who are actually proud of the skill that they have of taking the incoherent ideas of another person and making them intelligible. Not everyone can be a star, so why not?
cynic 23-5-2018 10:30 PM
Is it not fair that the reader is informed that the book is ghost written? Otherwise it would amou ...
Yes it would be preferable if they declared the ghost writers name upfront, but if ego or commercial conditions dictate that it can't be done, I'm cool with it.
yeah - just look at authors like Patterson - he's churning out 30 or so "books" a year some ghosts getting credit but most not
i dont mind people taking over "franchises" - - at least they're upfront about it and you know what you're getting (Girl with Dragon Tattoo comes to mind) - and some are even better than the originals who often get stale after 20 books with same hero (Patricia Cornwell?)
If one isnt capable of writing a book, much less penning his thoughts down, the book itself will largely be an interpretation of the ghost writer's perception of the source's viewpoint. I just don't see the point in reading a Ghost Written book!