Usually the equation is written the other way round. Let's flip this for once. What is that one movie you'd like to adapt into a book because it didn't give you a closure or didn't explore other characters.
There was a movie that released in 2005 called Naina. While the topic and treatment of the movie was fantastic, Urmila Matondkar's act left me a little in want of something more. I strongly believe that subject could have been better dealt with in a book than a movie.
It's a 1988 movie. A little dated. I am not sure if you will like it very much. But it's a caper - a heist if you will and a comedy, so you just might. I suppose you could give it a whirl. John Cleese and Michael Palin are, of course, old time Monty Pythoners.
bookbandit 2-5-2018 01:08 PM
It's a 1988 movie. A little dated. I am not sure if you will like it very much. But it's a caper - ...
Dated, yes. And many times it so happens that what you enjoyed earlier doesn't hold much interest now. Perhaps we are now used to crisp and clear HD prints with better sound technology and all, it's a bit tiresome at times to sit through those movies. From personal experience, I tried watching this movie again but couldn't finish it.
jhsurti 2-5-2018 06:48 PM
Dated, yes. And many times it so happens that what you enjoyed earlier doesn't hold much interest ...
I downloaded all of Monty Python (the entire series), and I am struggling through it. I don't find it the least bit funny. I don't know what the fuss is about. British humor is not for everybody.