| |

Craxme.com

 Forgot password?
 Register
View: 891|Reply: 1
Collapse the left

[Articles & News] Low carb diets are still a metabolic mystery. Experts can't even agree on how to measure the caloric effects.

 Close [Copy link]
Post time: 16-11-2018 03:40:10 Posted From Mobile Phone
| Show all posts |Read mode
Editado por Pedro_P en 15-11-2018 05:12 PM

Image
A very early metabolic chamber in use at the NIH
NIH
▼ A lot of nutrition science seems to  contradict itself, and the latest headline-making study is no exception.
Bodies are, in a lot of ways, like black boxes, especially when it comes to metabolism. We can measure what you take in and put out, but it’s difficult to know what’s really going on inside. Do carbohydrates prime your  metabolism to pack on the pounds? Some experts vehemently believe that they do, but plenty of other experts disagree just as forcefully. That doesn’t mean they don’t know what they’re talking about, it just means that nutrition science isn’t yet at a stage where we understand enough of the fundamentals to have a unified theory that everyone can subscribe to. Scientists are still debating a lot of the details.
This most recent debate is about whether low carb diets help you  burn more energy. Researchers who just published a study in the British Medical Journalsay they’ve got solid evidence that your metabolism increases when you cut carbohydrates. They’re not claiming this is the end-all-be-all account, they’re simply confident in their findings.
But a close look at the “limitations” section in their paper reveals a lot about what this debate is really about: methodology. These scientists used a method of quantifying metabolism called doubly labeled water that is considered by some to be a gold standard, but by others to be potentially flawed. “Some investigators recently proposed a novel reason why the doubly labeled water method—used extensively in nutrition research for decades—would bias comparisons among diets varying in macronutrient ratio,” the authors write. They conclude that this purported bias “is highly speculative and unlikely to be meaningful.” Yet plenty of other nutrition and obesity researchers think otherwise, so let’s unpack this.
Some nutrition studies, often the ones that make headlines, focus on weight loss because it’s the reason so many of us diet. But if you want to study metabolism, you can’t just see whether people lose weight on one diet or another. You have to find a way to measure how much energy a person is burning. There are a few ways to do that, but the main two are whole room calorimetry and doubly labeled water. (▪ ▪ ▪)

Please, read the full note here: Source

Rate

Number of participants 1Money +5 Collapse Reason
indranilsaha + 5

View Rating Log

Reply

Use magic Report

Post time: 16-11-2018 14:07:39
| Show all posts
Good Read....
Thanks for sharing
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

Mobile|Dark room|Forum

16-6-2025 01:58 AM GMT+5.5

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2025, Tencent Cloud.

MultiLingual version, Release 20211022, Rev. 1662, © 2009-2025 codersclub.org

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list