There Are More 'Pet' Tigers Than There Are in the Wild. How Did That Happen?

Pedro_P

Siberian tiger (Panthera tigris altaica), also known as the Amur tiger.
Credit: Shutterstock

▼ Thousands more tigersmay be living in private captivity or as exotic pets in the United States alone than there are anywhere in the wild, based on shocking estimates from a number of conservation organizations, Smithsonian recently reported.
Estimates of the U.S. pet-tiger population range from 5,000 to 7,000, according Born Free USA, an animal advocacy organization. Meanwhile, the worldwide wild tiger  populationis about 3,900, according to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).
But how did things get so bad? And how do conservation experts know how many tigers are in private captivity, when so many of their owners keep the animals off the grid?
In many states, there are no laws preventing people from owning exotic pets, said Prashant Khetan, CEO of Born Free USA. And in states that do have such laws, they may not be enforced. At the same time, several tiger breeders freely operate in the country, even as tiger habitats are threatened abroad, driving down the animals' numbers in the wild.
The typical person keeping a tiger as a pet, Khetan told Live Science, is wealthy enough to have a lot of land and to set up an enclosure for the big cat. They'll likely see a friend with a tiger or other exotic pet and decide they'd like to have one of their own. Sometimes, they turn the creatures into roadside attractions, he said. Other times, they treat the tigers as expensive luxury items to show off to their friends. Some captive tigers end up in circuses and other groups that turn the animals into entertainment for profit.
Usually, Khetan said, wannabe tiger owners acquire the big cats as cubswhen they're cuter and their behavior more closely resembles that of a house cat. That young stage, he said, can give exotic-pet fanciers the illusion that they can reasonably care for a tiger throughout its life. They can't: The full-grown big cats have needs – nutrition, vast space to roam and opportunities to hunt and learn – that private owners just can’t provide.
These tigers, according to Khetan, end up physically diminished compared with their wild cousins— unhappy, and unprepared for anything resembling life in the wild. The best-case scenario for a tiger rescued from a private owner, he said, is retirement to a responsible sanctuary.
Researchers don't have any way to track the U.S. private tiger population directly, Khetan said, though he said the 7,000 figure, almost double the nearly 3,900 in the wild, is probably close to correct. (▪ ▪ ▪)

► Read the full note here: Source

bsk

Informative

me4uinkolkata

This is really shocking information.

jayyogeswarusa

Shocking that means even in US you can get tiger attack

soothsayer

Such ostentatious behaviour should be totally banned. These are not domesticated creatures. They should be given freedom to roam in the wild to maintain ecological balance