- UID
- 20
- Online time
- Hours
- Posts
- Reg time
- 24-8-2017
- Last login
- 1-1-1970
|
Error, I did not say that violence must be unilateral, but rather that violence can cause a worse escalation. In a country, anyone who claims to be one, there are ways by which people settle their differences, without the use of force or weapons, that is the way of reason and legality, for that are the courts and the legislation that gives them meaning. In almost all countries, revenge is punishable by imprisonment, because it is assumed that a person should not be a judge and party and exercise justice by their own hand.
But on the other hand, there is the legitimate claim of a society or group of citizens, which should also be done through the appropriate channels, and not exercising violence as a language for them to be heard. Nobody would want to sit down to talk, with the sword of Damocles hanging over his head, that is, there is no way to dialogue with someone who threatens your life.
When there are no reasonable ways to channel the protest of the people, unfortunately violence will be the common language and repression will be the answer to those claims.
When a child is punished, that fact alone is already a manifestation of violence, children process violence, not as we process it adults, children assume that their lives are in danger because the person who must protect them is capable of ignoring or assault them. One can see an adult scolding slightly a child, but the child sees a being much larger than himself and with it the potential to inflict harm him/her. If you want to know how a child feels in front of an adult who scolds you, just lock yourself in a room with a polar bear... ;)
The upbringing of children who are mildly/strongly affected by parental violence, generates submissive and potentially aggressive adult people. Perhaps that is why most people are submissive to authoritarian governments, but at the same time, they are people who can easily lose control and attack.
There may be a lack of opportunities, but in my experience, if opportunities are not at hand, then one must build those opportunities... Certainly, education (with creativity, inventiveness and initiative) greatly influences that creation of opportunities... Unfortunately not all people have access to an education that develops the potential of the people.
Another mistake, the mothers-in-law are not afraid of them, but rather, they have to be kept away for as long as possible, they are the stone in the shoe that no one in their right mind wants to carry... By the way, not all mothers-in-law are bad, for example, mine lives in another country 
It is possible that there are people who feel comfortable with someone introducing her spoon in your soup dish, I am not.
On this side of the world, mothers-in-law do not they have a good image, because they are usually mothers who have not yet overcome the fact that their daughters and sons are already adults and need their own space free of interference to form their own families. But I suppose that in the future, women who become mothers-in-law will understand the value of keeping their distance. It seems that the Indian mothers-in-law are more benevolent than Latina mothers-in-law... You are very lucky... 
Oops... By the way, group your answers in a single reply, so that it is easier to read.  |
|