| |

Craxme.com

 Forgot password?
 Register
View: 954|Reply: 1
Collapse the left

Counterclockwise: FM radio is past its peak

[Copy link]
Post time: 16-12-2018 16:38:47
| Show all posts |Read mode

Image


FM radio has awesome features – it’s free, it doesn’t use up your data, it often has better reception than LTE, it offers various mixes of playlists (both hip and classic) along with news and up-to-date info. So, why does it seem like makers are increasingly reluctant to include it in their phones?

Well, while the FM receiver has certainly declined in popularity, there is still a variety of models to choose from. We put together this chart that counts the different number of models by multiple makers that have a receiver.

The peak was in the 2008-2010 period. The chart gets a little busy on the right (click on it to view a larger image), but the main takeaway is this – there is still variety for those who want to listen to terrestrial broadcasts.

You may have spotted Apple there on the bottom. The iPhone maker never included an FM receiver on its phones (though some iPods had one), we only included Apple in this chart to point the finger at them.

It’s important to note that the chart shows the number of models that makers produced, not sales – that part is up to you as a consumer.


Models with FM radio per year (click to view a larger image)

So, why is FM radio declining? It would be easy to lay the blame at Apple’s feet, after all the radio requires wired headphones (which it uses as an antenna). By the way, USB-C headphones work too, it doesn’t have to be through a 3.5mm jack.

But there are other factors to consider – the rise of music streaming combined with cheaper data plans, for one. Sometimes, the receiver is present but lacks software support – that was the case with the Galaxy S9/S9+ in the US and Canada (it was enabled via an update). There was a similar situation with the S8/S8+.

Samsung’s Galaxy S line tends to be the exception, however, most phones with €400+ price tags do not support FM radio. Not even the Galaxy Note phones, strangely enough. LG, vivo, Asus and a few others do pack a receiver into their high-end offerings, but not in all of them.

That’s odd – when did not having an FM receiver become an elitist feature?

Sooner or later FM radio broadcasts will cease. Norway already stopped national FM radio stations (local stations do still exist, though). The successor to analog radio is here already - DAB and HD Radio.

These can pack more stations in the same bandwidth, offering more variety, and more recent iterations offer improved quality. Streams up to 320Kbps AAC+ have been demoed, though 128Kbps and lower is much more common.


Unfortunately, there’s no wide support for these digital standards. The LG Stylus 2 (from early 2016) is the only phone we could dig up to have a DAB+ receiver. Would you like to see more models adopt digital radio? Do you use digital radio at home or in the car?


Source
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time: 16-12-2018 23:29:40
| Show all posts
Edited by seatlawyer at 17-12-2018 12:21 AM

I feel it's extremely unfair of mobile phone manufacturers to drop FM radio. The manufacturers claim that consumers have moved on to streaming media and dropping FM is therefore logical (in their opinion). It infuriates me. Who is Samsung or Apple to decide for me in its infinite wisdom, whether I prefer streaming media over FM broadcast and impose this decision on me? You leave the FM in place and let me be the judge of what I prefer

And I've been to places where the network connectivity is so poor, streaming media is simply out of question. My swanky Note 9 may be great for playing videos but its my puny backup phone at $25 Nokia 150 which plays FM for me when there's little else in such cases.

I mean, how much is it going to cost them to keep a tiny FM chip? Or how far is it going to flaw their handset shape, size or design? Or battery consumption? Why is it that in the opinion of mobile phone manufacturers, owners of  latest and flashiest flagship handsets don't want FM radio, but owners of less costly, value/budget cellphones do want FM radio? Do they think incorporating FM radio on their flagships tarnish the pricey-elite-showoff image of their flagships?

And supporters of FM radio have also suggested how FM may be valuable for emergency radio broadcasts when mobile networks may be incapacitated. There was some mudslinging between Apple and FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, with the latter urging Apple to activate the FM chipset in iPhones and the former claiming that no such existed in its phones.

Handsets can have step detector sensor, gyroscope, heart rate sensor, bluetooth, NFC and what not. But when it comes to an FM radio, no, that's too much to ask. When it is convenient for manufacturers' balance sheets', the consumers', in their opinion, have moved on from FM radio, 3.5' audio ports and user replaceable batteries

Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

Mobile|Dark room|Forum

9-6-2025 04:57 PM GMT+5.5

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2025, Tencent Cloud.

MultiLingual version, Release 20211022, Rev. 1662, © 2009-2025 codersclub.org

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list